The table below provides details of the complaints received during 1st half of 2008.
Please note that the following abbreviations may be used in the "Referred To" column of the table below:
| Number | Received | Complaint | Referred To | Full Reply | Action Taken | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 08/01/08 | Unhappy with way application was handled | ADPS | 30/01/08 | Explained application process and offered further discussions with case officer | 10/03/08 |
| 2 | 07/04/08 | Late notification to Planning Agents of increase in Planning Fees | SSM | 11/04/08 | Explained that delay was due to late notification by Central Government | 12/05/08 |
| 3 | 14/05/08 | Site visit did not allow view of proposal from complainant's property | DCM | 21/05/08 | Planning Officer's inspection had provided sufficient information to assess application - refusal of application would not have been justified | |
| 4 | 14/05/08 | Unhappy with delegated decision and processing of application | DCM | 21/05/08 | Decision rightly made under delegated powers. Application was processed correctly. |
Back to Navigation - Back to the top of this article
By sharing just a few words on how useful this page was, what was good, what was missing or confusing can really help us improve our website. Send a quick message to the web developer and your feedback will be used to improve this page. Do not use this form to lodge complaints or comments that need feedback.